Though Roosevelt gets credit for saving the nation, Hoover was far from a 'do-nothing president.'
EnlargePeter Boettke has an excellent commentary over at Coordination Problem, ?Is This How the Myth of the Laissez Faire Herbert Hoover Was Invented??. He concludes, ?Herbert Hoover was as much of a laissez faire president as Barack Obama has been or the leaders in Europe have been. From a free market perspective, the steps taken since 2007 have turned a market correction into an economy wide crisis and then a global crisis. Those steps were anything but ?do nothing,? and they were taken first by a Republican President and then pursued further by a Democratic President. We have never given ?nothing? a chance. But mythologies need to be created in order to tell neat historical tales. Laissez faire Hoover is replaced by activist FDR and the nation is saved.?
Skip to next paragraph The Circle BastiatThis is the institutional blog of the Ludwig von Mises Institute and many of its affiliated writers and scholars commenting on economic affairs of the day.
Recent posts
' +
google_ads[0].line2 + '
' +
google_ads[0].line3 + '
Pierre Lemieux in Somebody in Charge: A Solution to Recessions? provides a detailed and enlightening discussion of how the issues Peter raises in his post played out in the recent crisis. Policy failure, not market failure generated the malinvestments and crisis. The rush to do something slowed recovery.
From my review essay (pdf available on request), in The Independent Review ?A Crisis of Authority: Pierre Lemieux?s Somebody in Charge: A Solution to Recessions?, the SUMMARY?
?The roots of the recent financial crisis, according to economist Pierre Lemieux, lay not in greed and self-interest running amuck in unhampered markets, but in the policy and regulatory structure that created and enabled excessive leverage and risk taking. If Lemieux?s latest book were widely read, more people would believe that financial regulators and central banks are not needed to avoid financial crises and economic recessions.
And the conclusion:
?Lemieux?s conclusion that ?The causes and legacy of the economic crisis of 2007-2009 reveal a deeper underlying crisis, which is a crisis of authority? (p. 162). If this book was widely read and widely used in classrooms, it could be very useful in awaking more of the public that we do not need somebody in charge. What we need is ?Wicksteed?s car of collectivism? to ?be stored on a sidetrack? (p. 163).?
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on blog.mises.org.
cynthia nixon joe biden cspan state of the union drinking game oscar noms capital gains tim thomas
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.